2010, leaving the highest numbers of affected victims and catastrophic environmental damage around the world since it was known records, which constitutes a reference indicator in conjunction with some comprehensive management Management risk.
is just another example of the need to correct the paradigm of investment in risk management, focusing and executing the highest percentage of resources in prevention, preparedness and mitigation, and that investment in post-disaster is much lower. This is the most appropriate from the standpoint of public policy, because increased investment by the disaster, lower cost and easier to rebuild after the disaster.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, it is also appropriate to allocate resources for research and reformulation of standards, because in regard to rainfall, we do not know if he returns to the levels we had a few years ago, when they barely talked about climate change and the phenomena of the Pacific.
While the relevant authorities take the required decisions, hopefully without there being any kind of treaty or international engagement, but by belief in the collective consciousness, to the ordinary human beings we have prepared and organized to reduce our vulnerability.
ended
0 comments:
Post a Comment